🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking followers viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment recently following popular discussions suggested that switching their gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to include what they called "masculine-oriented" language - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who use online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - like a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Each day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where the same posts by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."